Cultural Heritage Master Plan

Share Cultural Heritage Master Plan on Facebook Share Cultural Heritage Master Plan on Twitter Share Cultural Heritage Master Plan on Linkedin Email Cultural Heritage Master Plan link

The County of Prince Edward, with support from its consultants WSP Canada Inc., is developing a Cultural Heritage Master Plan (CHMP). This plan will help manage and protect Prince Edward County's built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. The CHMP will align with the municipality's strategic plan and heritage planning goals and will build upon the municipality's Heritage Conservation Strategy (2011).

Throughout the process, the municipality and consultant team will seek input from the community, knowledge keepers, and all relevant stakeholders as it:

  • Develops the cultural heritage landscape strategy
  • Identifies potential cultural heritage landscapes
  • Finds opportunities to improve the management of important built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes

Check out the FAQ section at the side of this page to learn more about cultural heritage landscapes and built heritage resources.

An in-person public open house was held on Monday, October 6 at the Prince Edward Community Centre - Rotary Hall (375 Picton Main St). Click here to view the open house presentation.

Public comments and feedback on the Cultural Heritage Master Plan are being accepted until November 7, 2025.

Click here to read the Draft Cultural Heritage Master Plan - Phase 3 Report

The County held a virtual introductory public open house on Thursday, October 3, 2024.

The County of Prince Edward, with support from its consultants WSP Canada Inc., is developing a Cultural Heritage Master Plan (CHMP). This plan will help manage and protect Prince Edward County's built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes. The CHMP will align with the municipality's strategic plan and heritage planning goals and will build upon the municipality's Heritage Conservation Strategy (2011).

Throughout the process, the municipality and consultant team will seek input from the community, knowledge keepers, and all relevant stakeholders as it:

  • Develops the cultural heritage landscape strategy
  • Identifies potential cultural heritage landscapes
  • Finds opportunities to improve the management of important built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes

Check out the FAQ section at the side of this page to learn more about cultural heritage landscapes and built heritage resources.

An in-person public open house was held on Monday, October 6 at the Prince Edward Community Centre - Rotary Hall (375 Picton Main St). Click here to view the open house presentation.

Public comments and feedback on the Cultural Heritage Master Plan are being accepted until November 7, 2025.

Click here to read the Draft Cultural Heritage Master Plan - Phase 3 Report

The County held a virtual introductory public open house on Thursday, October 3, 2024.

Feedback

We welcome any feedback you may have on the Cultural Heritage Master Plan process. 

You need to be signed in to comment in this Guest Book. Click here to Sign In or Register to get involved

I want to draw attention to hidden heritage in the neglected north woods of PEC. Our family's 275 acres is mostly forested. We're off #35 at the eastern end of the largest forest left in the county, Great Escarpment Forest, an elevated, ten-kilometre spine of east-west running limestone covering 2500+ acres. Listed as candidate for provincial Area of Natural and Scientific Interest (ANSI) status. Our property is shot through with long sections of century-old stone walls, some still in remarkably good condition, with soldier courses, and even a three-sided stone pen feature. The thin rocky soil, fit only for pasture, couldn't easily hold a fence post. Working with horses pulling stone boats, building stone fences was extreme labor for early settlers, but such was their need. I expect there may be quite a network of stone walls/fences where areas of this forest used to be open or partially open pasture. It is worth acknowledging the challenges and accomplishments of early settler life. Maybe we'd complain less about our burdens today!

Kay Langmuir 23 days ago

I wasn't able to attend the recent public event to present the final draft f the plan however I've taken the time to read much of it. In my opinion is provides a comprehensive document. I do think that the comment made by Victoria Taylor regarding ensuring that sufficient setbacks from the Millennium Trail are maintained is CRITICAL to the integrity of the Trail. Somehow there must be insurances that this document is actually used and is implemented vs sitting on a shelf collecting dust. Thanks for listening! Penny Morris, Picton

Penny Morris about 1 month ago

I was pleased to see the PEC Millennium Trail included on the CHL list at last Mondays public open house and was wondering how the trail landscape is actually defined; especially as the integrity of the Millennium Trail is now under threat. In Picton, three Draft Plans of Subdivisions—Loyalist Heights, Cold Creek, and Fawcettville—are proposed along the trail. These subdivision plans show property lines abutting the trail’s edge with insufficient setbacks to preserve the dense hedgerow of trees and shrubs that provide essential habitat and visual buffering to future adjacent developments in PEC’s designated settlement areas. As a linear landscape with tree canopy, adjacent swales and wildlife habitats Millennium Trail offers an experience because of its green edges.

The CHL master plan could be an important planning tool to expand our perspective on this cultural heritage landscape and secure its future as a key piece of green infrastructure, one that encompasses both length and width.
Can the CHL master plan work help us to reframe the Millennium Trail not as a 48km path, but as a 200-acre linear park with 6m set backs on either side to allow the needed soil volume for tree and shrub growth.
As we consider development on lands zoned for growth, can the CHL master plan work help to prioritize the protection of the Millennium Trail edges as well as the path itself.

Victoria S. Taylor about 2 months ago

This is supposed to be a Plan, not an Inventory. A plan says what needs to be done: an inventory lists all items. This contract with WSP is for a certain amount of money: it is not open-ended. Some people on Monday seemed to think that the project should include making a list all the features of historical interest in the County. In practice, that's not realistic. But how, you may ask, can a Plan be created unless we know what exists to build the plan around? Difficult! But as was clear on Monday, it is not possible to make a complete inventory within the finite period of time remaining before the Final Report must be delivered. So, what I suggest is that as well as classifying sites by Type (eg. fisheries), they be classified by Importance. First Importance: a small number of sites (maybe 10?) for which individual plans will be written. Second Importance: these sites should be listed individually in the report and shown on the maps, but only a general plan, for all second-importance sites, will be included in the final report. Third Importance: all others, including all those which have not yet been identified by WSP. There should be a general plan for these, and some county organization should take on the long-term job of listing and mapping them.

Peter Jepson about 2 months ago

Was the Oct 6 meeting recorded so that folks can watch it to get up to date on the conversation? I think that the County is FULL of sites/locations/grounds that should be included in a Cultural Heritage Master Plan. One area that may be overlooked but has an important cultural history is Delhi Park. Thank you!

Penny Morris about 1 year ago
Page last updated: 07 Nov 2025, 06:16 PM